Keep the video in mind as you read the following: The underlying perspectives and principles that helped make it possible for human beings to commit the horrible wrongdoing evil seen in the video were taught with state sponsored propaganda and force to a generation of German youth. These Nazi teachings were not just meant to last a lifetime, but years worth of lifetimes.
Do not instantly seize upon a title that sounds appealing and plunge into it headlong. Instead, read carefully all titles that is, all topics or questions on the list. Remember that you may not change the title to something else that you wish you had been asked, but must respond to what the IB has given.
What are the key words or concepts? Are there key words of the Theory of Knowledge course in the title -- words such as "belief", "justification", or "truth"?
Are you clear about what they mean? Are you aware of ambiguities, or of possible alternative meanings? Think back on class discussions and check class notes. How are the key concepts related to each other?
Put the title into your own words to make sure you understand what is being asked. Do not even consider skipping this step.
What exactly are you being told to do? What are the key words of instruction? If you are told to "analyse" or "evaluate" a claim, then you are supposed to consider the arguments both for and against it, taking into account any ambiguities interpreting it.
Possible responses, for example: If you are asked "to what extent" or "in what way" the statement is justified, then you are being asked the same thing, but in different words.
If you are being asked a question directly "Is x true? If you are asked to "compare" areas of knowledge or ways of knowing, justifications, methodologies, or the like, you are being asked to examine both similarities and differences in response to the title. In some cases, the "how" question is simply a variation of "in what way?
Ultimately, all titles in Theory of Knowledge, no matter how they are phrased, ask you to do the same thing. You are being asked to think critically about major issues of knowledge.
These instructions tell you exactly what you are expected to do in your essay: Always justify your statements and provide relevant examples to illustrate your arguments, and remember to consider what can be said against them.
If you use external sources, cite them according to a recognized convention. Examiners mark essays against the title as set. Respond to the title as given; do not alter it in any way. Your essay must be between and words in length. Pay attention to the description of the top mark in each of the six criteria in order to set your goals for an appropriate essay.
It does you little good to play a brilliant game of football if you are being assessed on playing tennis. Note that the first two criteria emphasized in importance by being given double knowledge implied by the prescribed title is at the core of the Knowledge Issue s criterion, and that analysis and evaluation are at the core of the Quality of Analysis criterion.
This is a crucial step. Look at the descriptions of the zeroes in the Assessment Criteria! Do you understand clearly what a "problem of knowledge" is? If not, re-read the explanation: Uncertainties and difficulties are an integral part of our search for knowledge, and may even depending on your values make it more humanly interesting.
Do not treat an area of knowledge as inherently inferior simply because it is more difficult to assert that we can know something in that area than it is in others.
Do all cultures see these problems in the same way? What comparisons can you draw, what general conclusions do you reach, and what arguments can be made against those conclusions? What are the implications of your main points? Can you find examples to illustrate your arguments? Note down your ideas quickly, without trying to structure them yet.
Write until your mind runs dry.Many students find essay writing to be an especially daunting task. Depending on the essay topic, research can take anywhere from a few hours to several days and .
29 rows · Looking at the essay question in close detail will help you to identify the topic and ‘directive words’ (Dhann, ), which instruct you how to answer the question. Understanding the meaning of these directive words .
Six steps to writing a good TOK essay: A student guide. 1. SELECT A TITLE FROM THE LIST PROVIDED BY THE IB.
Do not instantly seize upon a title that . This essay on the fake news phenomenon, is one that many people find confusing, and which has impacted the face of modern politics. There are allegations. Critically examine the architecture, routines, and culture (ARC) framework of organisational design as proposed by Saloner, Shepard and Podolny in Strategic Management Gender Essay Ghana is a mixed but capitalist oriented economy” critically examine this statement.
A Review To Critically Examine The Procurement Methods Used By Coles And Woolworths To Secure Supplies And The Impact It Has On Their Suppliers. Executive Summary This report reviews and critically examines the procurement methods used byColes and Woolworths to secure supplies and the impact it has on their suppliers.